Ahmed Salah Arafa *, Ahmed yehia , Alaa fiad
1Magdy Salah El-Din Hussain, 1Hisham Wefky Anwar, 2Mostafa Mahmoud El Nakib, 1Amr Essam Mosaad*
Doaa Ahmed Mansour M.D., FRCS Eng
Moutaz Ragab1,Mohamed Hamed Abouelfadl1, Mahmoud M. Marei 1
Moutaz Ragab, Mahmoud M. Marei ,Mohamed Hamed Abouelfadl
Wadie Boshra MD, MRCS, Mohammed Attia Elsayed MD, Ahmed S. M. Omar MD.
Mahmoud Alhussinia, M. Ashraf Balbaab, Ahmed Tarek Awada, Tamer Abdelbakia
Ahmed El-Gendi1, Mohamed El-Shafei2, Essam Bedewy3
Elsobky A, MD
Ahmed Sawaby1, Islam Atta2, Amr El Abd3,Mohsen Ahmed Abdelmohsen4
Ayman M. A. Osman1 MD, MRCS (Eng); Hytham H. Mohey1 M.Sc.; Ahmed M. Ghobashy1 MD
Nezar A. Abo Halawa1*, Ahmed El-Abd Ahmed2, Sawsan A. Elkhateeb3, Galal H. Galal3
Nezar A. Abo Halawa1*, Mohamed Yousef Batikhe2
Wadie Boshra MD, MRCS, Abdallah Hamed Ibrahim Khalil MD, Fawzy Salah Fawzy MD, MRCS
Hussein Ali Mustafa Abdel-Motaleb, Mohammed Ahmed Mohammed Ismail, Islam Mohamed Nabil Atta & Ahmed Mohammed Ahmed Abdel-Rahim*
Reem Mohamed Ali Abd El Reheem El Masry1, Sameh Abd Allah Maaty2, Anwar A. El Shenawy3, Fawzy Salah Fawzy2
Comparison between Mass Ligation of Testicular Vessels versus Testicular Artery Sparing during Laparoscopic Bilateral Varicocelectomy
Background: Varicocele is an abnormal dilatation of the cremasteric venous plexus that may present with
scrotal pain or subfertility. Laparoscopic approach for bilateral varicocelectomy is safe and cost effective.
There is still a debate regarding the necessity of sparing the testicular artery during high varicocelectomy.
Aim: the aim was to evaluate and compare artery sparing and mass ligation of testicular vessels during
laparoscopic varicocelectomy. Patients & Methods: From April 2015 to January 2019, 37 patients
underwent laparoscopic bilateral varicocelectomy at Ain shams university hospitals and were divided into
2 groups: Group A (19); mass ligation and Group B (18); artery sparing. Both groups were compared as
regards the complications (hydrocele and recurrence) and testicular functions: average testis size, semen
sperm count and male hormones (S. Testosterone and FSH). All the patients were followed up for one year.
Results: The mean operative time in group A was 51.84 ± 8.08 min, in group B patients was 72 ± 13.5min
(P:0.001). Early clinical hydrocele occurred in 5.3% in group A and in 22.2% in group B (P:0.18).
Delayed radiological hydrocele occurred in 31.6% in group A and in 72.2% in group B (P:0.013).
Subclinical recurrence occurred only in 11.1% in group B (P: 0.23). Average testicular size, semen sperm
count and S. testosterone levels improved significantly in each group but when comparing both groups all
results were insignificant. Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, given the increased potential for
recurrence with the significant difference in operation time, no evidence was found to support the necessity
of sparing the testicular artery when performing laparoscopic bilateral varicocelectomy; however, larger
sized studies are required to confirm these results.
Key words: Varicocelectomy, laparoscopic, mass ligation, artery sparing, hydrocele, recurrence, testicular
functions.