Ahmed Salah Arafa *, Ahmed yehia , Alaa fiad
1Magdy Salah El-Din Hussain, 1Hisham Wefky Anwar, 2Mostafa Mahmoud El Nakib, 1Amr Essam Mosaad*
Doaa Ahmed Mansour M.D., FRCS Eng
Moutaz Ragab1,Mohamed Hamed Abouelfadl1, Mahmoud M. Marei 1
Moutaz Ragab, Mahmoud M. Marei ,Mohamed Hamed Abouelfadl
Wadie Boshra MD, MRCS, Mohammed Attia Elsayed MD, Ahmed S. M. Omar MD.
Mahmoud Alhussinia, M. Ashraf Balbaab, Ahmed Tarek Awada, Tamer Abdelbakia
Ahmed El-Gendi1, Mohamed El-Shafei2, Essam Bedewy3
Elsobky A, MD
Ahmed Sawaby1, Islam Atta2, Amr El Abd3,Mohsen Ahmed Abdelmohsen4
Ayman M. A. Osman1 MD, MRCS (Eng); Hytham H. Mohey1 M.Sc.; Ahmed M. Ghobashy1 MD
Nezar A. Abo Halawa1*, Ahmed El-Abd Ahmed2, Sawsan A. Elkhateeb3, Galal H. Galal3
Nezar A. Abo Halawa1*, Mohamed Yousef Batikhe2
Wadie Boshra MD, MRCS, Abdallah Hamed Ibrahim Khalil MD, Fawzy Salah Fawzy MD, MRCS
Hussein Ali Mustafa Abdel-Motaleb, Mohammed Ahmed Mohammed Ismail, Islam Mohamed Nabil Atta & Ahmed Mohammed Ahmed Abdel-Rahim*
Reem Mohamed Ali Abd El Reheem El Masry1, Sameh Abd Allah Maaty2, Anwar A. El Shenawy3, Fawzy Salah Fawzy2
Sandwich Vacuum Bogota versus Conventional Bogota Bag as Temporary Abdominal Closure (TAC) Techniques
Background: Open abdomen (OA) is a concept entailing the deliberate non-closure of the abdominal
fascia at the conclusion of surgery to prevent intra-abdominal hypertension or subsequent abdominal
compartment syndrome. Several temporary abdominal closure (TAC) techniques have been devised in the
management of OA. Patients and methods: 31 patients were allocated into 2 groups according to the
temporary abdominal closure method. The conventional Bogota bag group consisted of 15 patients; the
Sandwich Vacuum Bogota (SVB) group of 16 patients. Statistical analysis was performed to determine
whether the addition of a negative pressure system improved the outcome as regards lateral fascial
retraction, complication and reapplication rate as well as preservation of skin integrity. Results: There was
no statistically significant difference in the rate of skin-level approximation between both methods (p =
0.2). Yet, at the fascial level, the SVB group demonstrated CT evidence of a statistically significant superior
approximation rate (p = 0.007). No new fistula occurred but anastomotic leak occurred in a total of 11
patients with no significant difference between both groups. There was also no demonstrable advantage as
regards reapplication rate. Conclusion: Both TAC techniques are easily available and cost-effective. The
addition of a negative pressure system in SVB resulted in a higher fascial approximation rate, easier
control of efflux and maintenance of skin integrity.
Key words: Open Abdomen (OA) - Temporary Abdominal Closure (TAC) - Negative Pressure System -
Fascial approximation - Skin approximation.