Ayman Refaat1, Ahmed EL-Marakby, Ahmed Farghaly2, Hossam ELShamaa3, Mohamed Ibrahim4, Mohamed Hamed Salem5
Ahmed Gamal Eldin Fouad¹, Ahmed Faraghaly¹, Ahmed Elmarakby¹, Fatma Zeinhom²
1Amr Saleh El Bahaey, 2Ahmed Balboula
Fouad S. Fouad1 and Abdelrahman Mohamed2
1Mohamed Salama, 1Heba G.M. Mahmoud, 2Marwa Nabil, 1Mohamed Hassan
1Hebatallah G.M. Mahmoud, 1Mohamed Salama, 1John Wahib, 2Salem Eid, 1Omaya Nassar
Wael Ahmed Ghanem, Ahmed Bassiouny Radwan
Wael Ghanem
Sherif M. Mokhtar1 , Shady Elghazaly Harb1 , Hossam Hussein2 ,Shady Nabil Mashhour3
Shady Elghazaly Harb, Sherif M. Mokhtar, Sameh Mikhail
Osama G. Fahmy, Osama A. Radwan & Mohamed I. Monier
Ayman El Samadoni, Haitham A. Eldmarany and Amr El Bahaey
Salah M. Raslan MD and Hany M. Elbarbary MD, FRCS, FACS
Ayman El Samadoni1 , Haitham A.Eldmarany2
Hamdy A. Elhady
Hassan A. Abdallah1, Abd-El-Aal A. Saleem1, Osama A. AbdulRaheem1, Mohamed Yousef A2
Maged Rihan, MD, MRCS Mohamed M.Raslan ,MD
Mohamed Abd El-Monem Abd El-Salam Rizk, MD
Sherif Essam Tawfik MD, Mohamed Abd El-Monem Abd El-Salam Rizk MD, Abd elrahman Mohamed MD
Wael A Jumuah, MD; Yasser El Ghamrini, MD; Karim Sabry Abdel Samee, MD, MRCS (Ed)
Ahmed Sayed1,2, Hussein Elwan1 , Mostafa Elshal2, Ahmed Taha1,2
Can Distal Abdominal Esophagostomy Replace Gastrostomy in Esophageal Atresia?
Background: Conventional gastrostomy is essential in long gap esophageal atresia with or without
tracheoesophageal fistula and in postoperative major anastomotic dehiscence, but it has a lot of complications.
Objective: The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of distal abdominal esophagostomy in replacing
conventional gastrostomy. Patients and Methods: The distal esophagus was exteriorized on to the left upper
abdominal wall (abdominal esophagostomy) in 12 babies who had esophageal atresia with or without
tracheoesophageal fistula. The indications for this procedure were long gap esophageal atresia with or without
tracheoesophageal fistula in which primary anastomosis was not possible and a major anastomotic dehiscence
requiring cervical esophagostomy and gastrostomy. In all these patients a decision to replace the esophagus had
been made, and a cervical esophagostomy was constructed. The distal esophagus was mobilized either from the
thorax if thoracotomy had been done or by a transhiatal abdominal route. Results: All babies survived the
procedure, 3 unrelated deaths occurred. Narrow distal esophageal stump recorded in one patient. No skin
excoriation, no wound infection, no stomal retraction, nor vascular compromise of the distal esophageal stump
had been recorded. No reflux of gastric contents through the distal esophagostomy. Intermittent catheterization
for feeding found a great acceptability with the parents. Conclusions: Advantages of the abdominal
esophagostomy include absence of gastroesophageal reflux, no indwelling catheter, early institution of enteral
feeds, intermittent catheterization for feeding, easy nursing care, and no stomal complications. In addition, this
procedure allows the entire stomach to be available for esophageal replacement and retains the natural
gastroesophageal junction and the lower esophagus for anastomosis to any bowel segment being used for the
esophageal replacement.
Key Words: Distal abdominal esophagostomy, gastrostomy, esophageal atresia, long gap atresia,
tracheoesophageal fistula, anti-reflux mechanism, gastroesophageal reflux, post-operative fistula formation.