• Evaluation of Harmonic Scalpel vs Ligasure Device in Thyroidectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study in a Tertiary Care Center
    Abdel- Moniem I El-Khateeb, Gamal A Makhlouf, Ahmed M Khalfallah
  • Advancement in the Role of Laparoscopy in Complicated Appendicitis
    Eslam M. Ibrahim, Tamer A. Alnaimy and Mohammed Elkilanty
  • Prediction of Liver Failure after Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Patients Efficiency of Different Prognostic Scores
    Abdelrahim A. Abdelrahim, Farouk A. Mourad, Mostafa A. Hamad, Ahmed M. Ali, Ahmed M. Ibrahim, Mohmoud R. Shehata, Ragai S. Hanna
  • Changes in Level of Ghrelin Post Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
    Mostafa A. Elshazli, Mohamed D. Sarhan, Ahmed AbdAl Aziz, Mohamed.H.Khattab
  • Great Saphenous Vein Stripping versus Hemodynamic Correction (CHIVA) in Treatment of Varicose Veins of Great Saphenous Venous System
    Salah Soliman, Tamer Elgabary, EL Ashraf Thabet, Mahmoud Badawy
  • Utility of Commonly Used Preoperative Diagnostic Tools in Detecting Malignant Thyroid Nodules
    Abd Elhafez M. Elsheweal1, Ayman F. Ahmed2, Hala Y. Yousef2,Raafat Hegazy3, and Ahmed F. Elsaid4
  • Role of Liver Resections in Management of Major Hepatic Trauma
    Ahmed S. Mohammed, Mahmoud R. Shehata, Abd Elmoniem I. El-khateeb, Hany A. Ali, Tarek A. Mostafa, Ragai S. Hanna
  • Short term Outcome of Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract (LIFT) in Treatment of Transsphincteric Perianal Fistula
    Hany Mohamed (MD), Ashraf Goda (MD), Hatem Mohammed (MD)
  • Minimally Invasive Parathyroidectomy versus Conventional Open Parathyroid Exploration for Treatment of Primary Hyperparathyroidism
    Shaban M. Abdel Mageed
  • Immediate Flap Reconstruction Role in Long term Outcome of Post Mastectomy Radiotherapy
    Mohamed M.E Ibrahem2,*, Shaban M. Abdel Mageed1,*, and Shawki M.K Sharouda1
  • Evaluation of Transverse Coloplasty Anastomosis (TC) after Low Anterior Resection in Mid and Low Rectal Cancer
    Ahmed Morad, MD; Yasser El Ghamrini, MD
  • Axillary Exclusion Technique as a Method for Reducing Seroma Formation after Modified Radical Mastectomy
    Ahmed Morad, MD; Ahmed Aly, MD; Hossam El Sadek, MD
  • Challenges Of Surgical Management of Left Colonic Emergencies: A Multicentre Study
    Yasser Hussein1, Hazem Nour1, Dauda Bawa3, Mansour Morsy1, Salah Mansour1, Saleem Abdulsattar2, Medhat Mustafa2,Wael lotfy1
  • Comparative Study between Open and Trans-abdominal Pre-peritoneal Repair of Inguinal Hernia
    Mohammad Ahmad Abdel Gawad, Osama Ahmed Radwan, Ahmed Abdel Aal, Mohamed Gamal Eldin
  • Comparative Study between Non–laparoscopic and Laparoscopic-Assisted Distal End Placement in Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt in Adults
    Amr A A Mostafa Elkatatny MD, MSc., PhD1, Tarek M Hamdy MD, MSc., PhD1,Abdrabou N Mashhour MD, MSc., PhD2
  • Axillary Exclusion Technique as a Method for Reducing Seroma Formation after Modified Radical Mastectomy

    Ahmed Morad, MD; Ahmed Aly, MD; Hossam El Sadek, MD
    General Surgery Department. Faculty of Medicine – Ain Shams University, Cairo – Egypt

    Background: Seroma is one of the most common complications of conventional modified radical mastectomy (MRM) with axillary clearance in the management of breast cancer causing subsequent associated morbidities (Infection, Flap necrosis, Prolonged drainage and Delayed healing). The rate of seroma formation has been reported to be affected by the type of surgical procedure. Objective: To evaluate axillary exclusion technique for reducing seroma formation after modified radical mastectomy in the management of breast cancer. Patients and Methods: 40 female patients with breast cancer were recruited and divided randomly into 2 groups: The first group was managed by MRM and the other group was managed by MRM with axillary exclusion technique. Operative time, drainage volume and, seroma formation rate and wound infection were compared for both techniques. Results: Operative time was significantly longer in the group managed by MRM with axillary exclusion than in group managed by MRM only (85±8 minutes versus 59.5± 3.5 minutes respectively). No significant difference in the amount of blood loss between the 2 groups. Drainage volume was significantly less in the group managed by axillary exclusion technique than in the group managed by MRM only (300.85±29.4 ml versus 950.15±45.21 ml respectively). Only one patient suffered from seroma formation in the group managed by axillary exclusion in contrast to 7 patients in the group managed by MRM only (P value= 0.048). Conclusion: MRM with axillary exclusion technique in the management of breast cancer resulted in significant reduction in the drainage volume post operatively and thus the rate of seroma formation.