Mustafa Biomy and Eslam M. Ibrahim
Tamer Alsaied Alnaimy , Tamer Rushdy Elalfy and Mohammed A.Elkilany
Ahmed Mahmoud Hussein1 M.D.; Ahmed Abd Alaziz Mohammad1 M.D.; Ahmed Mohammed Ahmed Nasser2 M.Sc.
Sherif Essam Eldin Tawfik, MD; Abdelrahman Mohamed Salem, MD
Abdelrahman Mohammed, MD, Ahmed Kamal Gabr, MD, Sherif Essam Eldin Tawfik, MD
Ashraf Elsebaie MD, Ahmed Abdelsalam Hafiz MD, Ahmed Maher MD, Rasha Abdelkader MD
Ahmed M.S.M Marzouk, Haitham S. Omar
Hany F. Habashy
Maged Rihan, MD, MRCS
Karim Sabry (MD, MRCS) , Wael A Jumuah (MD) ,Yasser El Ghamrini (MD)
Ahmed Shoka, MD, MRCS, Fady Makram, MD, FACS, Mohamed Matar, MD, FACS.
Mohammed Matar,1 MD, FACS, Ahmed Shoka,1 MD, MRCS, Heba Nader,2 MD
Mokhtar Abd Elrahman Bahbah, MD; Ehab M Oraby, MD.
Youssif Khachaba, Waleed Reda, Ahmed Abd El Salam, Ahmed Samy Saad Hussein, Nadeen Mohamed El Essawy, Ashraf El Sebaie
Naguib Abdelkreem ElAskary MD, Ahmed Osmane MD
Mahmoud Hamda MS, Naguib Abdelkreem ElAskary MD, Ahmed Osmane MD
Ahmed M.S.M. Marzouk
1Waleed AlBadry, MSc, MRCS;1Raafat Gohar, MD; 1Ashraf El-Sebaie; 2Mohamed Salah, MD;1Mohamed Ashraf El Meleigy, MD
Evelauation of the use of Gastrisailtm Gastric Positioning Device during Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy, Early Experince
Aim: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has markedly evolved for the management of morbid obesity;
The dissection complications is the main concern. GastrisailTM is a recently released gastric positioning
system technology aiming to facilitate better control of potential surgical complications. In this work, we
evaluate the GastrisailTM positioning system use, with its impact on the early surgical outcome. Methods:
Retrospective comparative study of GastrisailTM Gastric positioning system comparing its use in 20
patients against 20 patients had sleeve gastrectomy without its use with assessment of the effectiveness and
impact on the operative and early postoperative outcomes. Results: Patients’ characteristics in (Group A)
16 (80%) were females and 4 (20%) were males, age was (Mean 33.75/ SD 6.48), BMI (Mean 43/ SD 3.97),
while in (Group B) 13 (65%) were females, and 7 (35%) were males, age (Mean 37.35/ SD 4.36), BMI
(Mean 44.19/ SD 4.06), Mean operative time was 140 Min. and 162.6 Min. Mean gastric dissection in both
groups was 24.9 and 37.3Min., mean gastric stapling time was 32.2 and 37.4 Min respectively. Number of
ports used was 4 ports in 14 patients (70%) and 5 ports in 6 patients (30%) for (group A), 5 in 18 patients
(90%) and 6 in 2 patients (10%) in (Group B), number of needed stapling reloads (60 mm) was 5 in
11patients (55%), 6 in 8 patients (40%), 7 in one patient (5%) (group A), and 5 in 4 patients (20%), 6 r in
13 patients (65%) and 7 in 3 patient (15%) in (group B). Intraoperative bleeding from solid organ injury
in 2 cases in (Group A) and 5 cases in (Group B) (P value < 0.01). Conclusion: Despite the added cost of
the use of GastrisailTM Gastric positioning system, the early outcomes push the use of such device to ensure
safer surgery. However, larger randomized studies are required.