Hany Balamoun FRCS MD , Karim G. Moustafa MD , Ahmed Abd Al Aziz MD and Mahmoud A. Ameen MD
Hany M.S. Mikhail MD, Abdrabou N. Mashhour MD
Ahmed Sayed1,2, Hussein Elwan1 , Walied Eldaly1 , Baker Ghonem1 , Morad Elkholy2 , Mohamed Ragab2 , Marwan Yousry1
Mohamed El-Maaddawy, Amr Abdulbaky, Usama Lotfi
Ayman M.A. Osman1 MD, MRCS (Eng), Ayman Salah Helmy1 MD, Hesham Abu Eisha1 MD, Wael L. Tobar1 MD, Abdel Kareem M. Abdel Kareem1 MB;BCh.
Amr Abdulbaky, Ahmed Elmahrouky, Hossam Anas, Hasan Soliman
Mahmoud Saber *, Wessam Wahdan**
Hany A. Balamoun MD, FRCS1 , Hany M S Mikhail MD, FRCS1 , Bahaa Meleka MD2
Ahmed Farghaly, Ahmed Marakby, Fouad Saad Eldin.
Dina Hany1,*, MD, Wafi Fouad2,*, MD, and Ramy Mikhael Nageeb1,*, MD
Tarek Ftohy Abdelrahman1 , Ahmed Gaber Hassanein1 , Mohammed Hasan Osman 2
Rasha Abdelkader, Sameh Nomani
Ahmed Nabil 1 and Rasha Abdelkader2
Fady Magdy Yacoub, MD, Khaled Sadek, MD, MRCS
Preserving the Nipple and Areola Complex in Surgical Intervention in Early Breast Cancer
Background: There are two widely accepted procedures that are used to surgically treat cancer of the
breast while preserving the nipple & areola complex (NAC); breast conservative therapy (BCT) using
oncoplastic procedures (OPS) and nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) with immediate reconstruction. Not
many studies directly compare the two methods. It is especially important to compare these methods in
studies specifically targeting the Egyptian population, due to different tumour biology, different
radiotherapy technique, and different body habitus. The goals are to compare NSM with autologous
reconstruction versus oncoplastic breast surgery regarding the aesthetic and oncologic results. Patient and
methods: The present study was conducted on 30 patients with Stage I and II breast cancer as well as
having tumors located within the breast tissue more than 2 cm away from the areola. The patients were
subjected to either OPS techniques (local tissue rearrangement or reduction mammaplasty techniques) or
NSM with autologous reconstruction (Latissimus Dorsi Flap). Long term assessment was carried on after 3
months including patient and doctor satisfaction. Results: Fifteen patients were surgically managed by
OPS and fifteen by NSM. All 30 cases in the study showed an overall good acceptance of the surgery,
however they were all concerned about the possibility of recurrence of the disease i.e. they are satisfied
regarding the cosmetic effect but still worried about the oncological aspect of the disease. As a single
breast its size, shape, contour, and NAC position and direction are satisfactory however due to patient
refusal of contra-lateral symmetrization the overall cosmetic outcome may appear unsatisfactory to both,
patients and plastic surgeons. Conclusion: Oncoplastic breast surgery (OPS) and Nipple sparing
mastectomy (NSM) are both safe and aesthetically accepted, however with OPS patients have to receive
breast radiotherapy with all its complications. In many cases, this will affect the aesthetic result. Patients
are becoming increasingly worried about developing a cancer in their breasts amidst a rising general
perception of increased breast cancer incidence. This in turn has led to an increased interest in
prophylactic mastectomies. Through immediate reconstruction, NSM offers patients the possibility of
maintaining an aesthetic breast while removing all the tissue liable to develop a malignancy in the breast.
Keywords: Breast cancer, nipple sparing mastectomy & oncoplastic breast surgery, immediate breast
reconstruction.