Ashraf Farouk Abdeer1, Amr Mohamed Elhefny2, Wadie Boshra Gerges3,John Sobhy Mamlouk Sawires4
Ahmed Samir Hosny, Mohamed Hosny Ezz El Arab, AmrAbd El Rahim Mohamed
Ahmed Samir Hosny, Ahmed M. Elmahrouky
Hassan A.Saad, Kamal Rabi Eid, Tamer Mohamed Elshahidy
Hany M S Mikhail1 MD FRCS, Athar S M Elward MD, Tarek A. Awad1 M.Sc MRCS, Mohamed H.A. Fahmy1 MD., Ahmed Amr Mohsen2 M.Sc
Amer nasr, MD;1 Mohamed A.Safy El Deen2
Hazem Abdel Salam Mohamed; Fawzy Salah Fawzy; Fady Assem Awad Youssef
Nader M. Milad (M.D, MSc, MRCS, MBBCh.)1, Ahmed Kandeel(M.D, MSc, MBBCh.)2, Mahasen Abougabal (M.D, MSc, MBBCh.)2, Karim K. Maurice (M.D, MSc, MRCS, MBBCh.)1
Ehab H. Abd El-Wahab,MD; Ahmad Gamal El Deen,MD; Amr H. Afifi,MD
Haitham Akram Saimeh
Tamer.M.EL Gaabary, MD, Mohamed Shaaban, MSc., Salah.S. Soliman MD, MRCS,
Mina Nabil Rashied Manasseh; Ibrahim Magid Abdel-Maksoud; Yasser Abdel-Samee Mohammed
Omar Sherif Omar MD, Ahmed El Nogoomi M.B.B.C.H, Ahmed Mostafa Shazly MD, Mahmoud A. Ameen MD
Platelet-rich plasma versus conventional dressing: does this really affect diabetic foot wound-healing outcomes?
Purpose: This study aimed to compare platelet-rich plasma (PRP) versus conventional ordinary dressing
in the management of diabetic foot wounds. Background: Diabetic foot wound treatment poses a
considerable burden on the medical system, with long waiting times for healing in the public hospital
system. PRP enables efficient treatment of many patients with hemostatic, anti-inflammatory, and analgesic
substances. Patients and methods: This prospective study was focused on 80 diabetic feet wounds. Patients
were divided into two groups: group A received conventional ordinary dressing (N=40, 50%) and group B
received PRP dressing (N=40, 50%). The mean follow-up period was 12 weeks. Results: The estimated
time of wound healing was 12 weeks for 82.5% of the patients in group A and 97.5% of the patients in
group B; the PRP group was found to be more effective with fewer complications, less infection, exudates,
pain, and failed healing: 17.5, 12.5, 32.5, and 2.5% versus 27.5, 42.5, 62.5, and 17.5% in group B,
respectively (p=0.001). The highest healing rate was observed for both groups at the fourth week, but it
was better for the PRP group (group B): 0.89±0.13 versus 0.49±0.11 cm2
jweek in group A. Conclusion:
There have been considerable advancements in the use of PRP in therapeutic processes in recent years in
tissue regeneration therapy. PRP is a powerful tool for the treatment of chronic wounds and very
promising for diabetic foot wounds; PRP enables healing, and reduces infection rates and exudates.
Keywords: Conventional ordinary dressing, diabetic foot wounds, healing outcomes, platelet-rich plasma.